Medical Insurance and Divorce: One Law Repealed- Another Enacted

Two years ago, Domestic Relations Law 177 was enacted, requiring parties to acknowledge their awareness that following the divorce they would no longer be eligible for medical insurance through their spouse on the basis of their marriage.

Recently, the laws governing equitable distribution were amended to require courts to consider the loss of medical insurance as a factor in awarding maintenance and distributing the marital property.

Unanticipated problems arose from the implementation of Domestic Relations Law 177 particularly because the statute mandated that all settlement or separation agreements, whenever executed,  contain specific language intended to insure that the parties were aware of the potential loss of health insurance coverage. The problem was that:

perhaps thousands of individuals who, after having lived for many years
subject to the terms of a stipulation/separation agreement relating to
their marriage, may now want a divorce. For each of these individuals,
it will be necessary that they find his or her former spouse and gain
his or her agreement to a modification of the stipulation/settlement so
that it complies with section 177 and therefore can be approved by a
judge. Quite apart from the logistical difficulties attached to this
obligation, which for spouses who have been separated for many years is
of questionable or no value, there will be additional financial consequences associated with reestablishing their attorney-client relation-
ships to re-execute stipulations or amend existing ones. Maybe more
importantly, the present statute is generating delays in the processing
of divorce actions - delays that could endanger the safety of litigants
where underlying issues of domestic discontent or violence exist.

To get around this problem, Domestic Relations Law 177 was repealed and a new law, Domestic Relations Law 255, enacted. Now, only agreements executed after October 9, 2009, must contain the statutorily mandated language.

To ensure that parties receive notice of the loss of medical benefits, the summons must not bear the notation that “once the judgment is signed, a party hereto may or may not be eligible to be covered under the other party's health insurance plan, depending on the terms of the plan.”
.

17 Responses

  1. Karen
    What about if nothing has been filed with the court - but, one spouse is threatening to drop the other from his insurance which is provided by his job? Can he do that?
  2. The solution would be to commence an action and seek and injunction barring the party from cancelling the insurance .
  3. Thank you for sharing with us, I believe this website truly stands out :D.
  4. 11/4/2016 @ 14:09:10: Thanks for the post clementlaw.com!
  5. Appreciate this site– very easy to navigate and lots to explore!
  6. 11/9/2016 Appreciate this site– extremely informative and a lot of stuff to consider!
  7. 11/11/2016 I'm pleased by the manner in which clementlaw.com covers this kind of subject matter. Generally on point, sometimes polemic, always well-researched and more often than not quite challenging.
  8. 11/15/2016 clementlaw.com does it again! Very thoughtful site and a good post. Keep up the good work!
  9. clementlaw.com always has well-written coverage about relevant topics. Will continue to visit and recommend.!
  10. Many thanks for the inspiring blog you've set up at clementlaw.com. Your enthusiastic take on the subject is absolutely contagious. Thanks again!
  11. In my estimation, clementlaw.com does a great job of covering subject matter of this type! Even if frequently deliberately polemic, the material posted is generally well-written and stimulating.
  12. I would like to thnkx for the efforts you've put in writing this website. I am hoping the same high-grade web site post from you in the upcoming also. Actually your creative writing skills has encouraged me to get my own website now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a good example of it.
  13. Congrats for the inspiring blog you've created at clementlaw.com. Your enthusiastic take on the subject is absolutely contagious. Thanks again!
  14. 1/19/2017 clementlaw.com does it again! Quite a informative site and a well-written post. Keep up the good work!
  15. "Great Blogpost! Hi there! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out_ and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading through your posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics?"
  16. Danke, darf ich das teilen?
  17. Ein hervorragender Fellsattel zeichnet sich zunächst dadurch aus, dass er ähnlich gut für das Pferd oder für den Reiter sein kann. Dieser Punkt sollte stets der entscheidende Punkt bei dem Kauf des Fellsattels sein. Nun könnte man ins Detail gehen und präzise Attribute der verschiedenen Modelle ins Auge fassen. Selbstredend spielt auch hier das Alter die entscheidende Rolle. Für Kinder eignen sich insbesondere anti-rutsch Sattel. Bei Erwachsenen kann der Punkt fast vernachlässigt werden. Ebenso maßgeblich ist natürlich der Komfort des Sattels. Jetzt bietet sich besonders ein Fell aus Lamm an. Dieser Stoff bzw. dieses Fell ist besonders angenehm und auch schonend zum Pferd. Ein Fellsattel aus Lammfell ist wahrscheinlich die erste Option die ein Reiter haben könnte. Jedoch ist dieser Sattel unter anderem in Sachen Preis enorm höher als andere.

Leave a comment

Contact Us Now!
(212) 683-9551